The company informed Al Jazeera that “the use of confidentiality agreements is a widespread industry practice for the protection of trade secrets, intellectual property, secret or confidential information, information or information relating to competition that we have an obligation to otherwise protect. We do not discuss publicly the details of the confidentiality agreements we may use. Appropriate due diligence will be implemented for potential suppliers, for example. B as part of the review of government and sector lists in the event of sanctions and/or other compliance issues. The terms and conditions in all supplier contracts require suppliers to ensure compliance with all applicable anti-corruption laws and to grant Boeing contractual rights in the event of violations, including termination rights. In addition, company procedures prohibit employees from obtaining gifts from suppliers or from having contact with suppliers that would even justify an appearance of inadequacy, and require all employees to comply with anti-kickback laws and regulations. Two months later, FAA investigator Tamra Lee interviewed 25 of Boeing`s top engineers and found that the “restricted communication with the FAA” of the confidentiality agreement was “corrective action.” The Boeing Directive establishes detailed procedures for the verification and approval of team agreements and other non-sale agreements with companies, including appropriate vigilance obligations, to ensure compliance with the U.S. Corruption Practices Act and other applicable anti-corruption laws. The terms and conditions of these agreements must contain guarantees that all anti-corruption laws in force will be complied with. Finally, employees must sign a “confidential information agreement” for employees, which prohibits employees from disclosing “confidential business information” that employees have access to while on the job.
“Confidential information” is broad in the agreement and includes, among other things, information on merits and staff members. Boeing has had its engineers sign a confidentiality agreement that has led some to discuss details of 787 Dreamliner projects with U.S. government authorities, as new documents show. “www.documentcloud.org/public/search/projectid%3A%2027443-boeing-faa-documents-june-2016%20″” Advertising/Searching for the collection of documents The program was so mysterious that even its waste was “disposed of according to the appropriate method sanctioned by the company,” according to the Confidentiality Agreement (NDA). Following the signing of the agreement, Boeing engineers informed Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials that they were prohibited from talking about certain features of the 787 airliner, triggering a state investigation. With respect to additional support, the Commission also found that it “generally classifies rules prohibiting the disclosure of lists of confidential and proprietary customers and sellers as Category 1 (a) rules. The NLRB stated that these rules were not intended to provide information “essential to the exercise of Section 7 rights, such as .B. Wages or wage information.” It also stated that they do not prohibit employees from “seeking assistance from customers or lenders in a dispute or from disclosing the names and locations of customers or lenders from sources other than the employer`s confidential records.” Boeing conducted its own investigation into the agreements and wrote to the regulator in May that “the NDA does not prohibit contact or communication with the FAA” and “does not limit discussion of regulatory compliance issues.”